Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

Dating... rejection...

Started by lonely girl, November 17, 2011, 01:10:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bishounen

Quote from: toxicblue on November 19, 2011, 10:21:07 AM
If I met someone who all of a sudden wants to date me more than before just because I'm trans, I wouldn't date them. Period. I'd date them because they like me, DESPITE being trans. So I don't care what excuses guys make, a ->-bleeped-<- is a ->-bleeped-<- and I'm not going to fall for one.

Fully understandable, as you want to be appreciated for your personality as a female and not because of your equipment.
  •  

sweetie87

Quote from: AndromedaVox on November 18, 2011, 10:58:49 AM
I have a few things to say in response to your post, lonelygirl.

First of all, I'm so sorry this happened to you. I can see from your avatar picture that you are very pretty and passable so I know that this must be a difficult issue with you since guys are probably attracted to you! I have some experience in this area, but as a post-op girl.

First off, it sounds like your relationship with him was going awfully fast. The fact that he was willing to talk about adopting kids and marriage with you after 2 weeks is somewhat of a red flag to me. I think if those conversations come up too early, they aren't really all that genuine. You can't talk seriously about the future until you really know/love someone in my opinion. Maybe try saving those serious conversations for later.

As for the disclosure of your trans status, I would say just feel it out and tell him when YOU are comfortable. From what it sounds like, you told him in tears and probably felt ashamed and embarrassed while disclosing. I think this makes a huge difference. I have told people I've dated (both male and female) but always told them in a confident manner. "This is my past, and it has shaped me into the person I am today. It has made me stronger and more mature. I am proud of that." Carrying yourself with confidence is KEY. If you want someone to accept you as you are, you have to show that you accept yourself.

As for the question of being post-op vs. pre-op, I can't really answer that. I never dated when I was pre-op but would imagine it would be much more urgent to tell the person, since sex will obviously come into play at some point in the relationship and they will have to know. I would imagine it may be easier for a guy who is straight to accept a trans girl who is post op since they wouldn't have to get used to male genitalia. However, I don't think that as a pre-op girl, there are no men who will accept you. Keep looking! He's out there! Just be confident and radiate self-love when you're telling. That's my advice.

This...

Quote from: ~RoadToTrista~ on November 19, 2011, 04:30:11 AM
Ugh, if I have to keep such a big secret in order for him to stay with me, then I don't even want to be with him. I think honesty is very important in a relationship.

...and this. Totally agree!

I found the following also very helpful and encouraging (quote from tsroadmap.com):
QuoteIn the same way that a straight-acting gay person has the choice of when to come out to someone, we have the choice of when to come out if we are accepted as female. This is extremely empowering, believe me. If you are accepted as female and decide to come out to someone about your transsexualism or don't think of it as a shameful secret, you will be immune to attempts by others to hurt you with words and actions meant to make you feel like you're less than female.

I feel sorry for what has happened to you... Finding that special guy can be really hard, but it's not impossible. Sometimes love comes when it is least expected... just keep having fun and maybe dating and enjoy the journey rather than focussing on the destination (mr. right) all the time. Maybe one day you will just find that mr. right when you didn't expect him to come. I also think you are very beautiful :)

xoxo Sweetie
  •  

Forever21Chic

Quote from: ~RoadToTrista~ on November 19, 2011, 04:30:11 AM
Ugh, if I have to keep such a big secret in order for him to stay with me, then I don't even want to be with him. I think honesty is very important in a relationship.

  K good luck finding him.  :laugh:

Quote from: Butterflyhugs on November 19, 2011, 05:19:37 AM
Never assume people will never know

   Don't assume they will either.

   My track record is 6-0 so it works for me!  ;D

   
  •  

Mahsa Tezani

Quote from: Rukia87xo on November 19, 2011, 02:48:48 PM
  K good luck finding him.  :laugh:

   Don't assume they will either.

   My track record is 6-0 so it works for me!  ;D



Guys are blind to their hormones. Like my brother a few years ago, hooked up with this big eared fella we'll call "CJ"...despite being a butterface, he had hot abs and acted like a straight boy on his voice mail.

So pretty much... I learned to not blab about being trans on fb...cuz men read those posts. If I mention "packing heat in the pants", I better be mentioning the side effects of a laxative.
  •  

MsDazzler

Quote from: lonely girl on November 17, 2011, 01:34:41 AM
Thanks for your advice ^^ I never knew theres a dating section on craigslist, I'm not a fan of online dating tho.. I think theres too much risk, and I'm not really desperate for it. Good luck to you and your BF ^^

I think online dating is a much safer way to meet guys - and you do not have to have that uncomfortable "revelation"... they can read your profile first. And always - ask "have you read my profile?" before getting immersed in any conversation! Some guys just look at photos and reply right away!

Men!  ::)
  •  

Annah

Quote from: Rukia87xo on November 19, 2011, 02:48:48 PM
  K good luck finding him.  :laugh:

   My track record is 6-0 so it works for me!


Luck has nothing to do with it. I sleep better at night telling my partner the WHOLE me rather than keeping secrets from him. I know first hand that telling guys up front is not an immediate "disqualifies." I've been on my fair share of dates to disprove your logic that the only way a guy will date a trans is by hiding.

You've been on 6 dates. Good for you. I wonder how many of those dates would stick around if you told them. For me, that is the true test that a guy truly likes me. When I fell in love with my boyfriend, I fell in the with him entirely. Likewise, he fell entirely in love with me. Through and through. From bones to skin, he adores me. It isn't just a superficial "outside appearance that attracts each other but our honestly, our hearts, our minds, and our ability to share everything with each other and knowing we will still be in each others arms at the end of the day.

And since you are pre op and your six guys never knew about your genetics, then I would be safe to assume you have yet to experience a sexual relationship with them (cuz your ultra thick plan of forever in stealth will be thinner than rice paper if sex was thrown into your equation).

So, give us a jingle when you hide who you are to a guy and then have sex with him.

I give props to "lonelygirl" for telling her guys upfront. It takes a lot of character and courage to do that. Not getting the guy because the truth was shared is not weak. And I am positive she will find a guy who will just shrug his shoulders and say "I don't care. I like YOU" when she tells them. If I have gotten several men like that I know as surefire hell she will.

Better to have one guy that loves EVERYTHING about you versus the six you aren't sure of.
  •  

Forever21Chic

Quote from: Annah on November 19, 2011, 06:19:32 PM
Luck has nothing to do with it. I sleep better at night telling my partner the WHOLE me rather than keeping secrets from him. I know first hand that telling guys up front is not an immediate "disqualifies." I've been on my fair share of dates to disprove your logic that the only way a guy will date a trans is by hiding.

You've been on 6 dates. Good for you. I wonder how many of those dates would stick around if you told them. For me, that is the true test that a guy truly likes me. When I fell in love with my boyfriend, I fell in the with him entirely. Likewise, he fell entirely in love with me. Through and through. From bones to skin, he adores me. It isn't just a superficial "outside appearance that attracts each other but our honestly, our hearts, our minds, and our ability to share everything with each other and knowing we will still be in each others arms at the end of the day.

And since you are pre op and your six guys never knew about your genetics, then I would be safe to assume you have yet to experience a sexual relationship with them (cuz your ultra thick plan of forever in stealth will be thinner than rice paper if sex was thrown into your equation).

So, give us a jingle when you hide who you are to a guy and then have sex with him.

I give props to "lonelygirl" for telling her guys upfront. It takes a lot of character and courage to do that. Not getting the guy because the truth was shared is not weak. And I am positive she will find a guy who will just shrug his shoulders and say "I don't care. I like YOU" when she tells them. If I have gotten several men like that I know as surefire hell she will.

Better to have one guy that loves EVERYTHING about you versus the six you aren't sure of.

     :laugh:  *cough*

Quote from: MsDazzler on November 19, 2011, 04:07:23 PM
I think online dating is a much safer way to meet guys - and you do not have to have that uncomfortable "revelation"... they can read your profile first. And always - ask "have you read my profile?" before getting immersed in any conversation! Some guys just look at photos and reply right away!

Men!  ::)

    I agree online dating is a good way to screen (no pun intended) your date before hand.

QuoteSome guys just look at photos and reply right away!

    That is sooooo true!  :D
  •  

Silvermist

Quote from: lonely girl on November 17, 2011, 01:10:12 AM
So far I had 3-4 potential boyfriends... all of them couldn't accept me after telling them right away, before dating, that I was born a boy, and still have a penis ....

Next day I got his message.. "I'm sorry, I can't accept the fact that you are biologically male. You are a really nice girl, I hope you can find someone that can accept you one day. We still can be friends, call me if you need my help.".. I skipped classes and cried on my bed for a long time.. It really sucks how he can accept a infertile girl.. but not a TS
IDK I really lost hope in dating... I just want to know some of you girl's experiences on dating, wether being rejected or accepted, and how long did that take you? and wether guys are more ok with you being post-op?
I'm not entirely clear on the situation. When you told him the truth, did you mention that you're pre-op? While I don't have firsthand experience, I imagine that being post-op would make a huge difference. If you want to be with heterosexual guys, you must assume that they are either not sexually attracted to penises (at best) or repulsed by penises (at worst). Therefore, the fact that you still have a penis will screen out many guys who might otherwise be OK with dating someone who was "born male." Maybe the reason why your ex-boyfriend could accept an infertile girl but not a TS was because infertile natal women have vaginas, while you have a penis. (There are some heterosexual guys who are attracted to penises, but they are rare. Human sexuality is an infinitely complicated matter.)

The term "biologically male" is a red herring to me. Once you've had SRS, there will be very, very few biological differences between you and a natal woman, the main being the XY chromosomes in your cells, rather than XX. However, chromosomes alone do not determine whether one is "biologically male" or female. A small number of people are born with XXY, XXXY, and XXXXY chromosomes. If you define "biological sex" by a single pair of chromosomes, then these genetic anomalies disintegrate that definition. People who have these conditions are medically considered "male," since they always develop some male anatomical characteristics and undergo some form of male puberty. But usually the chromosomal defect also results in gender ambiguity, i.e., intersexuality. Although I know that this is not the forum for intesex talk, I'd like to note that plenty of children born with very ambiguous genitalia have been neonatally assigned to be female. And as we all know from the David Reimer scandal, not all intersex people accept neonatally-assigned genders. (BTW, I know that David was technically not IS.)

(Speaking of intersex people, they are the truly invisible gender-variant people. Most everyday people become exposed to the concept of ->-bleeped-<- every once in a while, in the forms of cross-dressers, ->-bleeped-<-s, genderqueers, drag queens/kings, and transsexuals, but they don't have a clue about intersexuality and its implications. They believe that children must be born either distinctly male or female. But although ISs are different from MTFs and FTMs, they must be included in the conversations about TS acceptance because they still have to worry about explaining what they were "before," especially since many ISs retain some of their gender-ambiguous anatomies into adulthood, despite hormone therapy and genital reconstruction. If you think that telling a partner that you're TS is hard, imagine revealing to her/him that you have male breasts, large nipples, and a micropenis, or that you have clitoris that looks like a mini penis, and that your gender was decided after you were born because it was too ambiguous at birth.)

Getting back on topic, there would be a different issue if your ex-boyfriend broke-up with you just because you're TS, regardless of whether you're pre-op or post-op. That would be bigotry, pure and simple, and you could at least get some consolation by telling yourself that you deserve better than to be with a bigot anyway. I started a thread at another forum a few weeks ago, asking the question, "How much homophobia is behind transphobia?" This came from the idea that many transphobic men reject trans women, even the perfectly passable post-op ones, because they believe that trans women are actually men; thus, their disgust would be based on homophobia. At one point in the thread, I asked the rhetorical question that if these men can't get the thought of being sexual with another man out of their minds when confronted with a trans woman, then why are they not similarly concerned about whether they are pedophiles? After all, every natal woman was once a little girl.

The problems that the TS/TG community is still facing are very much the same as those faced by the black community several decades ago. Do you all remember the "one-drop rule" that was written into the laws of many jurisdictions? There's a classic Hollywood movie from the 1950s called Imitation of Life. One of the main storylines in the movie was about mixed-race girl who passed as white and resented both her racial identity and her black mother because of the discrimination that African Americans suffered at the time. In one harrowing scene, her white boyfriend beats her within an inch of her life when he learns that she's part black. We can hardly imagine something like that, or even just a nonviolent break-up for the same reasons, happening today because racism is shameful, and pretty much no one wants to be a racist. (Many white supremacists actually deny that they are racists.) Yet similar bigotry toward transsexuals is still socially acceptable, even as homophobia falls out of fashion. I think that there's nothing wrong with preferring to be with people of a certain race instead of another, so I think that there's nothing wrong with preferring to be with natal women/men and passable TSs instead of less-than-passable and pre-op TSs. But societies need to get to a point where "passing" simply means being more or less masculine or feminine, instead of hiding something. Mixed race people no longer have to hide, so no one has to "pass as white" anymore.

Based solely on your avatar pic, I think that you are easily one of the five most passable trans women that I've ever seen, so you're already the envy of most of the community. On top of that, you're more beautiful than 90% of all women, by any standard. The guys who reject you because you're TS are losers, literally. How many will end-up with natal women who look as good as you do? YOU should be sorry for THEIR loss. Maybe, in the future, you might try throwing a guy's bigotry back in his face by mentioning some of the things that I've said.


  •  

ToriJo

Quote from: ydgmdlu on November 19, 2011, 08:04:48 PM
If you think that telling a partner that you're TS is hard, imagine revealing to her/him that you have male breasts, large nipples, and a micropenis, or that you have clitoris that looks like a mini penis, and that your gender was decided after you were born because it was too ambiguous at birth.)

One difference for IS people is that "it wasn't their choice" in many people's eyes, and being TS was a "choice" in some people's eyes (not in mine).  Because of this bogus idea of TS people having choice, that makes TS a sin while IS is just an effect of sin (seriously, people believe this kind of garbage).  So in this respect IS people are at a bit of an advantage.  They also can say "I was never a man, but I needed surgery to fix defects" and be believed (sadly TS people often aren't).  TS people, sadly, can't as easily say the same thing (despite it being equally true).

But that said, I think both are hard situations to be in within society today and I don't think there is point in comparing sufferings.  (I also think TS is IS, as the brain is as much part of biology as genitals are - but I recognize that's a rather controversial statement, albeit mostly for political reasons [IS people, sadly, hold prejudices too and also sometimes think it's more politically expediant to use society's prejudices to say "You can hate those TS people, because IS is nothing like TS..."])

As for one drop of blood, that's a reasonable analogy sadly.  I think society and law sees TS (and IS) people as neither male or female, and, thus, not sexual beings worthy of any relationship.  For instance, a post-op woman married to a non-trans man cannot have a legal marriage in all 50 states in the USA - nor could she if she then got divorced and married a woman.  Neither marriage would be universally legally accepted within the USA.  The only thing that one could conclude from this is that TS people aren't supposed to marry anyone.  :(  It's a double sided sword. (I'll add that this is also the official Catholic doctrine - TS people that convert to Catholicism shouldn't marry anyone, ever have sex, etc - they are to live in celibacy apparently)

I hope things get better soon for everyone and that one day there will be no debate about whether a woman should share she is (edit: or was) TS or not - she'll simply be accepted as the woman she is.  What I can say as someone who has always had an "M" on my documents and doesn't see a need to change it is that love can do funny things.  I never considered that my future wife might not have always had an "F" on her driver's birth certificate.  Love can make people think of things that they never thought of before.  :)
  •  

Silvermist

Quote from: Slanan on November 19, 2011, 08:39:05 PMOne difference for IS people is that "it wasn't their choice" in many people's eyes, and being TS was a "choice" in some people's eyes (not in mine).
One of my pet peeves is the whole "choice" issue, which people on all sides usually get wrong. The moral value of something is different from one's moral responsibility. Whether or not one chooses doesn't make it right or wrong; one is merely more or less responsible for it. Thus, to argue against homophobes about whether homosexuality is a choice is not only pointless but also counterproductive. A schizophrenic psychopath doesn't "choose" to kill people in his blind, murderous rampage, and he would be acquitted of murder in a court of law. But murder is still wrong. You can find plenty of homophobes (many of whom are Catholic) who agree that homosexuality itself is not a choice and isn't wrong, but "engaging in homosexual acts" is wrong. Likewise, I'm sure that you could find people who would agree that feeling like a woman trapped in a man's body and desiring a sex change is neither a choice nor wrong, but they'd argue that merely transitioning is wrong.

AFAIK, there's nothing in the Bible, or the scripture of any major religion, that addresses transsexualism. The Bible forbids cross-dressing, which virtually everyone everywhere today ignores because some traditionally male clothes (e.g., pants) are now commonly worn by women without arousing any complaints. The Bible does not hold castration to be sinful, and there is absolutely nothing in the text about getting a neovagina. So SRS would be a morally-neutral act, neither a sin nor a virtue.

We all know about the "Duck test": "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck." If someone looks like a woman, acts like a woman, sounds like a woman, and has all of the external body parts of a woman, then where does the line get drawn about whether or not this person is a woman? If a man has his genitals completely amputated by accident, then in what sense is he still a man? After all, he can no longer perform the most fundamental act that every man was born to do: penetrate another person with his penis. If what determines whether someone is a "man" is more than just one thing, no matter if it came at birth, then the same ought to apply to women.

Quote from: Slanan on November 19, 2011, 08:39:05 PMBecause of this bogus idea of TS people having choice, that makes TS a sin while IS is just an effect of sin (seriously, people believe this kind of garbage).
Keep in mind that one of the fundamental tenets of Christianity is the concept of inherited sin. All humans are inherently sinful because of descendance from Adam and Eve. Judaism, Islam, and Baha'i Faith reject "original sin." If someone believes that intersexuality is the "effect of sin," then the intersex person would've logically inherited that sin and would not have the right to choose to be male or female.

Quote from: Slanan on November 19, 2011, 08:39:05 PMThey also can say "I was never a man, but I needed surgery to fix defects" and be believed (sadly TS people often aren't).
The matter is complicated by those cases in which an intersex person is neonatally assigned the wrong gender and must, like David Reimer, undergo further sex reassignment therapy later in life. There have definitely been members of Susans.org who are both IS and MTF or FTM.

Quote from: Slanan on November 19, 2011, 08:39:05 PMBut that said, I think both are hard situations to be in within society today and I don't think there is point in comparing sufferings.
You've missed my point. Even after all available surgeries and hormone therapies, an intersex person who identifies as male might still have a micropenis or partially functional, somewhat natural-looking reconstructed genitals, which makes complete stealth (in regards to potential sex partners) impossible. Given how society emphasizes certain aspects of masculinity, that remaining deformity may never cease to cause the person shame. On top of that, being born only "halfway male" may feel worse than being FTM because one would have the experience of never measuring-up his whole life, rather than having the ability to change into a different body.

Furthermore, since humans are naturally averse to things that defy easy categorization, a "true hermaphrodite" (in the medical sense) would be even more bewilderingly "queer" (by which I mean "strange") than a transsexual. The "advantage" that TSs have is that if they are rejected as "real (wo)men" then at least there's an alternative gender by which others can regard them. A severely intersexed person doesn't have that and would otherwise just be seen as an "it."

Quote from: Slanan on November 19, 2011, 08:39:05 PMFor instance, a post-op woman married to a non-trans man cannot have a legal marriage in all 50 states in the USA - nor could she if she then got divorced and married a woman.  Neither marriage would be universally legally accepted within the USA.
I'm not sure that this is true. While the states are debating how the "full faith and credit" clause applies to same-sex marriage, I don't know of any disputes over recognizing a legal sex change. In other words, if a trans woman changes all legal documentation to reflect her post-transition gender, then I don't see how her marriage to a man would fail to be legally recognized anywhere. Marriage is a legal arrangement, so even in places that outlaw same-sex marriage, someone who is legally female (trans or not) should still be able to marry a man. But please correct me if I'm wrong.


  •  

toxicblue

Quote from: ydgmdlu on November 19, 2011, 10:57:35 PM
One of my pet peeves is the whole "choice" issue, which people on all sides usually get wrong. The moral value of something is different from one's moral responsibility. Whether or not one chooses doesn't make it right or wrong; one is merely more or less responsible for it. Thus, to argue against homophobes about whether homosexuality is a choice is not only pointless but also counterproductive. A schizophrenic psychopath doesn't "choose" to kill people in his blind, murderous rampage, and he would be acquitted of murder in a court of law. But murder is still wrong. You can find plenty of homophobes (many of whom are Catholic) who agree that homosexuality itself is not a choice and isn't wrong, but "engaging in homosexual acts" is wrong. Likewise, I'm sure that you could find people who would agree that feeling like a woman trapped in a man's body and desiring a sex change is neither a choice nor wrong, but they'd argue that merely transitioning is wrong.

AFAIK, there's nothing in the Bible, or the scripture of any major religion, that addresses transsexualism. The Bible forbids cross-dressing, which virtually everyone everywhere today ignores because some traditionally male clothes (e.g., pants) are now commonly worn by women without arousing any complaints. The Bible does not hold castration to be sinful, and there is absolutely nothing in the text about getting a neovagina. So SRS would be a morally-neutral act, neither a sin nor a virtue.

We all know about the "Duck test": "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck." If someone looks like a woman, acts like a woman, sounds like a woman, and has all of the external body parts of a woman, then where does the line get drawn about whether or not this person is a woman? If a man has his genitals completely amputated by accident, then in what sense is he still a man? After all, he can no longer perform the most fundamental act that every man was born to do: penetrate another person with his penis. If what determines whether someone is a "man" is more than just one thing, no matter if it came at birth, then the same ought to apply to women.
Keep in mind that one of the fundamental tenets of Christianity is the concept of inherited sin. All humans are inherently sinful because of descendance from Adam and Eve. Judaism, Islam, and Baha'i Faith reject "original sin." If someone believes that intersexuality is the "effect of sin," then the intersex person would've logically inherited that sin and would not have the right to choose to be male or female.
The matter is complicated by those cases in which an intersex person is neonatally assigned the wrong gender and must, like David Reimer, undergo further sex reassignment therapy later in life. There have definitely been members of Susans.org who are both IS and MTF or FTM.
You've missed my point. Even after all available surgeries and hormone therapies, an intersex person who identifies as male might still have a micropenis or partially functional, somewhat natural-looking reconstructed genitals, which makes complete stealth (in regards to potential sex partners) impossible. Given how society emphasizes certain aspects of masculinity, that remaining deformity may never cease to cause the person shame. On top of that, being born only "halfway male" may feel worse than being FTM because one would have the experience of never measuring-up his whole life, rather than having the ability to change into a different body.

Furthermore, since humans are naturally averse to things that defy easy categorization, a "true hermaphrodite" (in the medical sense) would be even more bewilderingly "queer" (by which I mean "strange") than a transsexual. The "advantage" that TSs have is that if they are rejected as "real (wo)men" then at least there's an alternative gender by which others can regard them. A severely intersexed person doesn't have that and would otherwise just be seen as an "it."
I'm not sure that this is true. While the states are debating how the "full faith and credit" clause applies to same-sex marriage, I don't know of any disputes over recognizing a legal sex change. In other words, if a trans woman changes all legal documentation to reflect her post-transition gender, then I don't see how her marriage to a man would fail to be legally recognized anywhere. Marriage is a legal arrangement, so even in places that outlaw same-sex marriage, someone who is legally female (trans or not) should still be able to marry a man. But please correct me if I'm wrong.

I haven't read the whole post, but as far as I know, that verse that refers to banning crossdressing actually refers to men dressing as women to avoid being in the army, or women dressing as men to get in the army.
  •  

ToriJo

Quote from: ydgmdlu on November 19, 2011, 10:57:35 PM
I'm not sure that this is true. While the states are debating how the "full faith and credit" clause applies to same-sex marriage, I don't know of any disputes over recognizing a legal sex change. In other words, if a trans woman changes all legal documentation to reflect her post-transition gender, then I don't see how her marriage to a man would fail to be legally recognized anywhere. Marriage is a legal arrangement, so even in places that outlaw same-sex marriage, someone who is legally female (trans or not) should still be able to marry a man. But please correct me if I'm wrong.

Unfortunately no state defines man or woman in law.  Some agencies in government do, but they all define it differently - and none define it for the purpose of marriage - and this is only done through administrative rules, not statutes.  These rules are only binding on the agency that created the rules.

The administrative rules for having an M or F on a birth certificate or a driver's license do not automatically apply to social security (for instance).  Or to marriage.

The most well known case law is the Littleton v. Prange that is controlling in parts of Texas.  The court decided that DNA mattered (ironically without any DNA evidence presented at trial - they just assumed that the post-op person was XY) and that because her changed birth certificate originally said "M" and that saying "M" was, in the court's eyes, not a mistake at the time, she was still "M".  Ironically, this ruling has been used by some lesbian couples where one partner is MTF to obtain a same-sex marriage in Texas.  (the court also specifically stated that the ruling does not apply to IS people - one of the ways that IS people do not face the same problems as TS people)  In other words, someone with the right parts and the right documentation did not have a legal marriage.

At least parts/all of Florida, Kansas, Illinois, New York, Nevada, Ohio, and Texas have court rulings that deny post-op MTF people the right to marry non-trans men, regardless of documentation status and gender markers.  (I don't know of any marriage cases involving FTMs).  FWIW, California, Colorado (1973! but not directly about marriage [edit: and the one that I know of involving FTM non-op]), Louisiana, and New Jersey have case law that would seem to recognize post-op people's sex.  This doesn't mean that someone couldn't convince a clerk to issue a marriage license in any of these states, or that a clerk would actually do it in a given state - but it does affect the validity of the marriage if a marriage license is issued (marriage license does not mean that the marriage is legal, unfortunately).
  •  

Jen-Jen

Quote from: JenJen2011 on November 18, 2011, 10:43:25 AM
Being attracted to our dicks is a major turn off for many so that's why it's a problem.
Wow,  lets have SRS and have them being attracted to our pussys! Wow that's such a difference!  ::) Men are just attracted to what's in between our legs whether we are CIS or Trans period!  :o yeah i said it!  8) They just want to get laid! Sorry but I hear it from both sides(cis and trans) all the time geez  and its just stupid.

->-bleeped-<-s, oh no ->-bleeped-<-s, there's trans ->-bleeped-<-s, gay ->-bleeped-<-s, blonde ->-bleeped-<-s, brunette ->-bleeped-<-s,redhead ->-bleeped-<-s, virgin ->-bleeped-<-s, chubby ->-bleeped-<-s, etc etc.. Men are ->-bleeped-<-s period so are women  :o old ->-bleeped-<-, young ->-bleeped-<-, hung ->-bleeped-<-, get my drift. People chase their preferences including transpeople. I know I do.
Don't judge a book by its cover! My lifes been like a country song! True love, amazing grace, severe heartbreak, buckles, boots n spurs! I 've been thrown off the bull a couple times, I keep getting up and dusting myself off! Can't give up on my happily ever after!
  •