Quote from: lilacwoman on November 01, 2011, 06:41:24 PM
costs, rejection issues etc.
simpler to stick with well known techniques.
plus a major issue that must be mentioned is that we all hope to have once and for all surgery so how devastating/debilitating/expensive/ souldestroying would it be to have a vagina fail and be rejected?
the girls who find that surgery has had complications and especially the fistulas go through months/years of repair and hospitalisations...who wants that?
You can't pretend that current techniques are perfect and it requires people to not be satisfied with those current techniques to actually go out and help pioneer new technologies and indeed there are women even on this forum who eschew Penile inversion SRS because of it's drawbacks and I wish all the best to them if the promise of this technique addresses the deficiencies they find with the current techniques and they want to get this done.
While what you say makes sense in regards to Sensation as nerves would not be conserved in grafted material as for your claims about fistulas Do you have any sources for your information or is your aversion to it simple luddism?
As for me Sensation and Function are most important of all, No technique grants me fertility so sensation comes above most for me, And while the promise of less dilation is an intriguing one, I'd rather go with penile inversion for that reason.