Quote from: tekla on December 20, 2012, 02:33:51 AM
'Catty' and 'supportive' are not two sides of the same coin. And while relationships might trend one way or the other (though I'm not sold on it) it's pretty easy to find (without looking too far), men who are very emotional, and women who are as emotionally distant and detached as the best of men every had to offer. And while men are not as picky about clothes perhaps they tend not to like or respect men who are crappy parents and are not wild about other guys who are way out of shape either. It's just that they don't talk it all over, or hash it out - they just exclude the ones they don't wish to have around.
Hmm ... I don't want to have a big fight about this, and of course it's true that any generalisation is always open to counter-examples, but I don't think you would find too many people who would dispute the following propositions, all of which I would qualify with the preface 'on the whole' and the caveat that plenty of people diverge from them - like me, for instance. But anyway ...
Women are more interested in and take more time, care, trouble and money over their own appearance than men.
Women are extremely aware of how other women look - it is a cliché, but true to say that women dress for other women. They will notice the details of one another's appearance in a way that most men can't begin to grasp (an instant, forensically detailed analysis of hair, clothes, accessories, shoes, weight, etc. And they will comment on it, often very flatteringly, sometimes very cuttingly - and will see it as an area of competition in a way that most men don't.
When two female friends, acquaintances or colleagues see one another, especially at a social event, they will almost always make a nice comment about the other's appearance - noticing and complimenting a new haircut, asking, 'I love your dress/shoes/whatever, where did you get it/them?', or just saying how slim they look. Straight men are much, much less likely to do this, (a) because they often don't notice what their friends look like from one day to the next, (b) because they don't really care and (c) because they don't want to sound gay. [Personal note: I once forgot my 'act like a man' mantra and told the guy I was buying a car from that his shirt matched his eyes ... the look of pure horror on his face has been etched on my memory ever since!!]
Women exchange personal details when they meet, about themselves, their menfolk, their children, medical problems, the works. Men tend to assume that if the other guy seems OK and he's not volunteering information then he's fine, so there's no need to go into details. A basic scenario: guy comes back home after a drink with an old pal, let's call him Frank. His wife/girlfriend knows Frank and Frank's partner and kids. When her man gets home she asks him how they all are, expecting a proper answer. The guy shrugs his shoulders, 'Fine, I guess.' The women sighs at the absolute idiocy of men. The guy thinks, 'We had a good time. We drank some beers, saw the game. What's the problem?'
As it happens, men are perfectly capable of opening up about their emotions. I know, because that's what my conversations with my male friends are like. But as an old, old friend of mine, who knows about my dysphoria said (affectionately) when we were talking, 'Most of my friends aren't like you.'
Women's relationships, from their earliest girlhood are filled with very complex emotional and almost political undercurrents. The Byzantine intrigues that go on within girls' friendship groups - who's in, who's out: who isn't talking to whom; who's not been invited to whose sleepover, etc - have no real parallel in the much more straightforward interactions of boys. If you don't believe me, go talk to some women, particularly mothers who have daughters and sons and ask them how different the two are. Even in adulthood, women will 'drop' a friend in a much more active way than men will, just as they will rally round, support and reinforce their friends much more actively than men do.
As for the cattiness, women are just as competitive as men, albeit about different things. But they are powerfully socialised - not least by their mothers and female peers - to be nice, to affiliate with other girls/women and not to be overt in their ambitions. As a result, the very obvious fights and the ritualised sporting contests that are such a huge part of male lives are matched by much more subtle, underhand and, yes, bitchy interractions between women.
Plenty of people find these kinds of generalisations offensive on political grounds. Plenty of others think they're just obvious common sense. Either way, I would say that the sense that there are both biological (brain-chemistry, physiology, etc) and social/developmental differences in the way men and women think, behave and interact is becoming more, not less accepted within the scientific community.
And as a writer, I'd say it was the basis of a huge amount of the drama I see all around me and try to describe on the page.