Quote from: iKate on May 11, 2015, 08:51:44 PM
It's because genitals do not determine gender. Isn't that the whole argument we go telling the world why we are who we are?
I never said they did. In fact, I rarely talk about gender per se. Gender truly may be viewed as a spectrum (alternatively a matrix, or even a mess ...).
By contrast, being cross-sex identified (or transsexual) reduces to a binary concept and solution. It isn't purely so from a biological standpoint, but it manifests in binary identification and a drive to binary living. One may be cross-sexed, have gender issues, both, or neither. As my self-understanding clarified, I found myself strongly cross-sex identified and what I thought were gender issues just dissipated. The pathological en-femme presentation drive that was masking my real issue melted away under the influence of hormones, despite a heightened need to resolve my physical conflict. A common occurrence, as you likely know. I rarely dress anymore, and when I do, I don't really think much of it one way or another. No girly needs, no undue concerns about attractiveness, etc. At this point, the physical changes are just work to do and then it's get on with life. The identity issue is over already. Social transition will add nothing more
in that regard (only - trust me, I'm not minimizing its importance in other ways). I don't particularly care about gender any longer except as an interesting socio-political concept.
If you accept, as I do, that the essence of transsexuality is conflict between body and mind, then forgoing available corrections to fix that problem -
by choice - seems to point at either other motivations for transition, or perhaps other factors overriding intensity. Mind you, I'm not judging anyone's motives for transition in a qualitative sense. It is also true that many cannot pursue surgeries for any number of reasons. Different issue entirely. My comment was focused on those who claim a mind/body issue - to be cross-sex identified, but then find that social transition (and perhaps hormones) resolve that issue. I'm happy for anyone who can resolve their gender problem in the least invasive way, of course, but it's a a non-sequitur as it relates to the core issue underlying transsexuality. A gender problem is eminently resolvable by transition alone. Cross-SEX identification is not.
My statement on SRS AND FFS was somewhat exaggerated for effect, of course. It presumes a conflict over one's facial structure, for example, and not everyone has either the conflict or even a facial structure issue, neutrally considered. There are plenty of men with facial structure and features that are feminine or neotenic, which is perceived as much the same. The ones I find curious are those with decidedly masculine facial hard tissue structures that (again) choose not to do anything about it, i.e., would not do anything even if the means were at hand, nothing preventing it medically, etc. It flies in the face (!) of the nominal conflict.
I should also say that I agree with the comment about hormones taking care of certain issues, at least for some. I've been told I don't need FFS by several people I trust. I pretty much pass when dressed despite the rarity of being gendered female when not. I don't believe them, of course, but that's on me. I do see the changes that hormones have wrought on my face.